linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/21] sched/idle: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87frof26y7.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 23:33:52 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, Anna-Maria Behnsen
 <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
 Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl
 <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Kees Cook
 <kees@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] sched/idle: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_on_stack()

On Mon, Oct 28 2024 at 11:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:50:44AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > Do NOT send partial series. How the hell am I supposed to review things
>> > if I don't even get to see the implementation of things,eh?
>> 
>> Can you tone down a bit? This was an oversight and I did not notice when
>> going over it. The full thread is in your LKML inbox, so can you just
>> move on?
>
> *sigh*.. how am I supposed to know it's an over-sight? Some people are
> actively pushing for this broken arse 'model' of posting.
>
> Yes, I can dig out the remaining patches, but that's more work for me.
> As you well know, I don't really need more work.

Nobody needs more work. But as we (as a community) can't agree on how to
post a 150+ patch series with a potential cc list of 200+ people and a
gazillion of mailing lists, there are only a few options left. And yes,
any model will annoy some people...

You at least got the cover letter, no?

I'm tired of posting a "Add new API/infrastructure" patch and then
finally 5 years later having the last newly added offender converted
over. I rather inflict the pain once, but obviously there is no way to
please everyone.

> I suppose I'll see a new posting eventually or not, who knows.

I'm happy to personally bounce you the pile if you insist or
alternatively annoy everyone with a resend of the full glory as well.

Not sure what that buys, but one thing is sure that we both wasted 10
times more time debating this nonsense than what it would have cost you
to look at the full mail thread which is in your LKML folder anyway.

Seriously?

Thanks,

        tglx