linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] dma-engine: sun4i: Add has

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5eedfe71-7a8d-4b91-ab49-e09352e7d6f3@prolan.hu>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 08:31:13 +0100
From: Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mesih Kilinc
	<mesihkilinc@...il.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai
	<wens@...e.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel Holland
	<samuel@...lland.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] dma-engine: sun4i: Add has_reset option to quirk

Hi,

On 2024. 10. 27. 21:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> You did not build v2. Then you send v3... which you also did not build.
> 
> Please start at least compiling your own code. Then start testing it,
> but without building it cannot obviously be even tested.

I forgot to rebase an amend! before sending v2, which I corrected in v3. 
I *did* in fact build v3 (after the aforementioned correction) rebased 
on top of Linux 6.5, which is what I have available for my board. And I 
also *did* test with aplay and confirmed to have working audio. If you 
believe there are differences between 6.5 and master that break v3 of 
the patch, then please point those out as opposed to making accusations.

Bence