[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <47dcebb90753f8647a946442df4d8cb9bb9621b8.1729865740.git.namcao@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 08:35:52 +0100
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 08/12] hrtimers: Remove unnecessary NULL check in hrtimer_start_range_ns()
The 'function' field of struct hrtimer can only be changed using
hrtimer_setup*() or hrtimer_update_function(), and both already null-check
'function'. Therefore, null-checking 'function' in hrtimer_start_range_ns()
is not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index d11697492bdb..2e03b07cbdac 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -1276,8 +1276,6 @@ void hrtimer_start_range_ns(struct hrtimer *timer, ktime_t tim,
struct hrtimer_clock_base *base;
unsigned long flags;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ACCESS_PRIVATE(timer, function)))
- return;
/*
* Check whether the HRTIMER_MODE_SOFT bit and hrtimer.is_soft
* match on CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT = n. With PREEMPT_RT check the hard
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists