[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99730b97-2adf-4688-9430-423d8e0dee4a@amlogic.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:46:11 +0800
From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] pinctrl: meson: Add driver support for Amlogic A4
SoCs
Hi Christophe,
Thanks for your advice. It will be added in the next version.
On 2024/10/18 23:51, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> [你通常不会收到来自 christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr 的电子邮件。请访问
> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification,以了解这一点为什么很重要]
>
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> Le 18/10/2024 à 10:10, Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay a écrit :
>> From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com>
>>
>> Add a new pinctrl driver for Amlogic A4 SoCs which share
>> the same register layout as the previous Amlogic S4.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/meson/Kconfig | 6 +
>> drivers/pinctrl/meson/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-amlogic-a4.c | 1253
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 1260 insertions(+)
>
> Hi,
>
> a few nitpicks below.
>
> ...
>
>> +
>> +static struct meson_pmx_group a4_periphs_groups[] = {
>
> I think that struct meson_pmx_group could be const.
> (same for a4_aobus_groups above)
>
>> + /* func0 as GPIO */
>> + GPIO_GROUP(GPIOE_0),
>> + GPIO_GROUP(GPIOE_1),
>> +
>
> ...
>
>> +static struct meson_pmx_func a4_periphs_functions[] = {
>
> I think that struct meson_pmx_func could be const.
> (a4_aobus_functions above as well)
>
>> + FUNCTION(gpio_periphs),
>> + FUNCTION(uart_a),
>> + FUNCTION(uart_b),
>> + FUNCTION(uart_d),
>> + FUNCTION(uart_e),
>> + FUNCTION(i2c0),
>> + FUNCTION(i2c1),
>> + FUNCTION(i2c2),
>> + FUNCTION(i2c3),
>> + FUNCTION(pwm_a),
>> + FUNCTION(pwm_b),
>> + FUNCTION(pwm_c),
>> + FUNCTION(pwm_d),
>> + FUNCTION(pwm_e),
>> + FUNCTION(pwm_f),
>> + FUNCTION(pwm_g),
>> + FUNCTION(pwm_h),
>> + FUNCTION(remote_out),
>> + FUNCTION(remote_in),
>> + FUNCTION(dcon_led),
>> + FUNCTION(spinf),
>> + FUNCTION(lcd),
>> + FUNCTION(jtag_1),
>> + FUNCTION(gen_clk),
>> + FUNCTION(clk12_24),
>> + FUNCTION(emmc),
>> + FUNCTION(nand),
>> + FUNCTION(spi_a),
>> + FUNCTION(spi_b),
>> + FUNCTION(pdm),
>> + FUNCTION(sdio),
>> + FUNCTION(eth),
>> + FUNCTION(mic_mute),
>> + FUNCTION(mclk),
>> + FUNCTION(tdm),
>> + FUNCTION(spdif_in),
>> + FUNCTION(spdif_out)
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct meson_bank a4_periphs_banks[] = {
>
> I think that both struct meson_bank could be const.
>
>> + /* name first last irq pullen pull dir out in */
>> + BANK_DS("E", GPIOE_0, GPIOE_1, 14, 15,
>> + 0x43, 0, 0x44, 0, 0x42, 0, 0x41, 0, 0x40, 0, 0x47,
>> 0),
>> + BANK_DS("D", GPIOD_0, GPIOD_15, 16, 31,
>> + 0x33, 0, 0x34, 0, 0x32, 0, 0x31, 0, 0x30, 0, 0x37,
>> 0),
>> + BANK_DS("B", GPIOB_0, GPIOB_13, 0, 13,
>> + 0x63, 0, 0x64, 0, 0x62, 0, 0x61, 0, 0x60, 0, 0x67,
>> 0),
>> + BANK_DS("X", GPIOX_0, GPIOX_17, 55, 72,
>> + 0x13, 0, 0x14, 0, 0x12, 0, 0x11, 0, 0x10, 0, 0x17,
>> 0),
>> + BANK_DS("T", GPIOT_0, GPIOT_22, 32, 54,
>> + 0x23, 0, 0x24, 0, 0x22, 0, 0x21, 0, 0x20, 0, 0x27,
>> 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct meson_bank a4_aobus_banks[] = {
>> + BANK_DS("AO", GPIOAO_0, GPIOAO_6, 0, 6,
>> + 0x3, 0, 0x4, 0, 0x2, 0, 0x1, 0, 0x0, 0, 0x7,
>> 0),
>> + BANK_DS("TEST_N", GPIO_TEST_N, GPIO_TEST_N, 7, 7,
>> + 0x13, 0, 0x14, 0, 0x12, 0, 0x11, 0, 0x10, 0, 0x17,
>> 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct meson_pmx_bank a4_periphs_pmx_banks[] = {
>
> I think that both struct meson_pmx_bank could be const.
>
>> + /* name first lask reg offset */
>> + BANK_PMX("E", GPIOE_0, GPIOE_1, 0x12, 0),
>> + BANK_PMX("D", GPIOD_0, GPIOD_15, 0x10, 0),
>> + BANK_PMX("B", GPIOB_0, GPIOB_13, 0x00, 0),
>> + BANK_PMX("X", GPIOX_0, GPIOX_17, 0x03, 0),
>> + BANK_PMX("T", GPIOT_0, GPIOT_22, 0x0b, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct meson_pmx_bank a4_aobus_pmx_banks[] = {
>> + BANK_PMX("AO", GPIOAO_0, GPIOAO_6, 0x00, 0),
>> + BANK_PMX("TEST_N", GPIO_TEST_N, GPIO_TEST_N, 0x0, 28),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct meson_axg_pmx_data a4_periphs_pmx_banks_data = {
>
> I think that both struct meson_axg_pmx_data could be const.
>
>> + .pmx_banks = a4_periphs_pmx_banks,
>> + .num_pmx_banks = ARRAY_SIZE(a4_periphs_pmx_banks),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct meson_axg_pmx_data a4_aobus_pmx_banks_data = {
>> + .pmx_banks = a4_aobus_pmx_banks,
>> + .num_pmx_banks = ARRAY_SIZE(a4_aobus_pmx_banks),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct meson_pinctrl_data a4_periphs_pinctrl_data = {
>
> I think that both struct meson_pinctrl_data could be const.
>
>> + .name = "periphs-banks",
>> + .pins = a4_periphs_pins,
>> + .groups = a4_periphs_groups,
>> + .funcs = a4_periphs_functions,
>> + .banks = a4_periphs_banks,
>> + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(a4_periphs_pins),
>> + .num_groups = ARRAY_SIZE(a4_periphs_groups),
>> + .num_funcs = ARRAY_SIZE(a4_periphs_functions),
>> + .num_banks = ARRAY_SIZE(a4_periphs_banks),
>> + .pmx_ops = &meson_axg_pmx_ops,
>> + .pmx_data = &a4_periphs_pmx_banks_data,
>> + .parse_dt = &meson_a1_parse_dt_extra,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct meson_pinctrl_data a4_aobus_pinctrl_data = {
>> + .name = "aobus-banks",
>> + .pins = a4_aobus_pins,
>> + .groups = a4_aobus_groups,
>> + .funcs = a4_aobus_functions,
>> + .banks = a4_aobus_banks,
>> + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(a4_aobus_pins),
>> + .num_groups = ARRAY_SIZE(a4_aobus_groups),
>> + .num_funcs = ARRAY_SIZE(a4_aobus_functions),
>> + .num_banks = ARRAY_SIZE(a4_aobus_banks),
>> + .pmx_ops = &meson_axg_pmx_ops,
>> + .pmx_data = &a4_aobus_pmx_banks_data,
>> + .parse_dt = &meson_a1_parse_dt_extra,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id a4_pinctrl_dt_match[] = {
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "amlogic,a4-periphs-pinctrl",
>> + .data = &a4_periphs_pinctrl_data,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "amlogic,a4-aobus-pinctrl",
>> + .data = &a4_aobus_pinctrl_data,
>> + },
>> + { },
>
> Usually, there is no extra "," after a terinator item.
>
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, a4_pinctrl_dt_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver a4_pinctrl_driver = {
>> + .probe = meson_pinctrl_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "amlogic-a4-pinctrl",
>> + .of_match_table = a4_pinctrl_dt_match,
>> + },
>> +};
>
> ...
>
> CJ
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists