[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0861d73d-4fd9-4118-91c8-5a619c7d7ca0@fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:50:02 +0000
From: "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 1/3] selftests/watchdog: add count parameter for
watchdog-test
On 27/10/2024 08:28, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/24/24 19:39, Li Zhijian wrote:
>> Currently, watchdog-test keep running until it gets a SIGINT. However,
>> when watchdog-test is executed from the kselftests framework, where it
>> launches test via timeout which will send SIGTERM in time up. This could
>> lead to
>> 1. watchdog haven't stop, a watchdog reset is triggered to reboot the OS
>> in silent.
>> 2. kselftests gets an timeout exit code, and judge watchdog-test as
>> 'not ok'
>>
> This test isn't really supposed to be run from kselftest framework.
> This is the reason why it isn't included in the default run.
May I know what's the default run, is it different from `make run_tests` ?
>
>> This patch is prepare to fix above 2 issues
>
> This series needs a separate cover letter explaining how this problem is
> being fixed.
Cover letter is in this patch, see below:
In addition, we can get the 'How' by reading the simple change in each change.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
>> ---
>> Hey,
>> Cover letter is here.
>>
>> It's notice that a OS reboot was triggerred after ran the watchdog-test
>> in kselftests framwork 'make run_tests', that's because watchdog-test
>> didn't stop feeding the watchdog after enable it.
>>
>> In addition, current watchdog-test didn't adapt to the kselftests
>> framework which launchs the test with /usr/bin/timeout and no timeout
>> is expected.
>> ---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists