linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/1] MAINTAINERS: replace bouncing maintainers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241028112359.3333152-1-benedikt.niedermayr@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:23:58 +0100
From: Benedikt Niedermayr <benedikt.niedermayr@...mens.com>
To: konstantin@...uxfoundation.org,
	baocheng.su@...mens.com,
	tobias.schaffner@...mens.com,
	pavel@....cz,
	lee@...nel.org,
	hdegoede@...hat.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
	wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	felix.moessbauer@...mens.com,
	christian.storm@...mens.com,
	quirin.gylstorff@...mens.com,
	chao.zeng@...mens.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] MAINTAINERS: replace bouncing maintainers

Since there where complaints [1] about bouncing maintainers we have now a
replacement for maintainers that stepped away from their duties.

I'm going to address all participants from the above discussion, so that everybody
is informed about the change. I also added the related subsystem maintainers.
Please tell me if I should avoid this in the future, and whom I should exactly address
for changes in the MAINTAINERS file.

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg47105.html

Benedikt Niedermayr (1):
  MAINTAINERS: replace bouncing maintainers

 MAINTAINERS | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--
2.34.1