[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241028112857.GF24052@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 13:28:57 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add error recovery
mechanism
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:13:31AM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 18:23:50 +0200
> Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > +static int sn65dsi83_reset_pipeline(struct sn65dsi83 *sn65dsi83)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_device *dev = sn65dsi83->bridge.dev;
> > > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
> > > + struct drm_atomic_state *state;
> > > + int err;
> > > +
> > > + /* Use operation done in drm_atomic_helper_suspend() followed by
> > > + * operation done in drm_atomic_helper_resume() but without releasing
> > > + * the lock between suspend()/resume()
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN(dev, ctx, 0, err);
> > > +
> > > + state = drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state(dev, &ctx);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(state)) {
> > > + err = PTR_ERR(state);
> > > + goto unlock;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + err = drm_atomic_helper_disable_all(dev, &ctx);
> > > + if (err < 0)
> > > + goto unlock;
> > > +
> > > + drm_mode_config_reset(dev);
> > > +
> > > + err = drm_atomic_helper_commit_duplicated_state(state, &ctx);
> >
> > Committing a full atomic state from a bridge driver in an asynchronous
> > way seems quite uncharted territory, and it worries me. It's also a very
> > heavyweight, you disable all outputs here, instead of focussing on the
> > output connected to the bridge. Can you either implement something more
> > local, resetting the bridge only, or create a core helper to handle this
> > kind of situation, on a per-output basis ?
>
> A full restart of the bridge (power off/on) is needed and so we need to
> redo the initialization sequence. This initialization sequence has to be
> done with the DSI data lanes (bridge inputs) driven in LP11 state and so
> without any video stream. Only focussing on bridge outputs will not be
> sufficient. That's why I brought the pipeline down and restarted it.
Fair point.
> Of course, I can copy/paste sn65dsi83_reset_pipeline() to a core helper
> function. Is drm_atomic_helper_reset_all() could be a good candidate?
The helper should operate on a single output, unrelated outputs should
not be affected.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists