[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241029140853.GD14555@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:08:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Rome <jordalgo@...a.com>,
Sam James <sam@...too.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kerne.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] unwind, perf: sframe user space unwinding
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 02:47:27PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> - Is the perf_event lifetime managed correctly or do we need to do
> something to ensure it exists in unwind_user_task_work()?
You probably want a sync/cancel somewhere near the start of
_free_event().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists