lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241029144948.GIZyD2DBjyg6FBLdo4@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:49:48 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
	"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
	seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 03/13] x86/sev: Add Secure TSC support for SNP guests

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 09:34:40AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> TDX also makes use of initialization that happens in mem_encrypt_init()
> and mem_encrypt_setup_arch(), so it doesn't only use tdx_early_init().

I think he means that mem_encrypt_init() should do some more "generic" memory
encryption setup while the vendor-specific one should be concentrated in
vendor-specific calls.

But this is all meh - there are vendor checks in all the memory encryption
paths so I'm not sure what we're even discussing here actually...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ