lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c00c8669-cb1d-4125-9c9a-34d63641c226@icloud.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 23:38:16 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I
 <kishon@...nel.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
 Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof WilczyƄski <kw@...ux.com>,
 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] phy: core: Fix that API devm_phy_destroy() fails
 to destroy the phy

On 2024/10/29 21:45, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:39:28PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>>
>> For devm_phy_destroy(), its comment says it needs to invoke phy_destroy()
>> to destroy the phy, but it does not invoke the function actually since
>> devres_destroy() will not call devm_phy_consume() at all which will call
>> the function, and the missing phy_destroy() call will case that the phy
>> fails to be destroyed.
> 
> Here too, split in at least two sentences.
> 

okay.
>> Fixed by using devres_release() instead of devres_destroy() within the API.
> 
> And add a comment about there not being any in-tree users of the
> interface.
>

okay, will do it within v2.
> And consider dropping it.

okay, will follow the same action as [PATCH 2/6]

> 
>> Fixes: ff764963479a ("drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework")
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
> 
> Johan


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ