linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Introduce a new clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <31df356f-9160-43e3-b1b9-bba43da5f0f2@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:20:08 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
 "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Introduce a new clock_gating lock

On 10/29/24 11:39 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
> But this is a format change while making functional change.

I think it's common to fix code style issues if code has to be modified
for one reason or another, in this case the indentation level?

Thanks,

Bart.