linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/msm/dp: rename edp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA8EJpqXE4U4nH8yjtYEryJ4ZOmnDxo--+eUm2_AvDymufjVjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 22:25:01 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, 
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, 
	Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/msm/dp: rename edp_ bridge functions and struct

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 at 20:08, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/28/2024 4:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Follow the estalished prefix and rename eDP bridge symbols to use
> > msm_dp_ prefix, moving the edp to the end of the symbol name.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> > index 6a0840266c0f..ff9ce9b15234 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> > @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs msm_dp_bridge_ops = {
> >       .debugfs_init = msm_dp_bridge_debugfs_init,
> >   };
> >
> > -static int edp_bridge_atomic_check(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> > +static int msm_dp_bridge_atomic_check_edp(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> >                                  struct drm_bridge_state *bridge_state,
> >                                  struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >                                  struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
>
> msm_dp_bridge_atomic_check_edp looks a bit odd.
>
> What about just msm_edp_bridge_atomic_check?
>
> Likewise for other edp names.

Yeah, I was torn between these two options. I'll switch to the second one.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry