[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZODA7AkC6Y7d_fhGnR3MH8MV-0QZC6aKi0FfwJwv++PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:14:54 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, peterz@...radead.org, andrii@...nel.org,
jannh@...gle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, mhocko@...nel.org, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, hannes@...xchg.org,
david@...hat.com, willy@...radead.org, brauner@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
arnd@...db.de, richard.weiyang@...il.com, zhangpeng.00@...edance.com,
linmiaohe@...wei.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: convert mm_lock_seq to a proper seqcount
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 8:48 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 17:57:34 -0700 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > I got a notification that this patch set was applied to mm-unstable by
> > Andrew. But I was wondering if Andrew and Peter would agree to move
> > the patches into tip's perf/core branch, given this is a dependency of
> > my pending uprobe series ([0]) and, as far as I'm aware, there is no
> > urgent need for this API in mm tree(s).
>
> OK by me.
Great, thank you! Then I'll hope Peter will just apply all 4 patches
into his tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists