| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20241029-v5_user_cfi_series-v7-18-2727ce9936cb@rivosinc.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:44:18 -0700
From: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
alistair.francis@....com, richard.henderson@...aro.org, jim.shu@...ive.com,
andybnac@...il.com, kito.cheng@...ive.com, charlie@...osinc.com,
atishp@...osinc.com, evan@...osinc.com, cleger@...osinc.com,
alexghiti@...osinc.com, samitolvanen@...gle.com, broonie@...nel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 18/32] riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack
prctls
Implement architecture agnostic prctls() interface for setting and getting
shadow stack status.
prctls implemented are PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS,
PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS and PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS.
As part of PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS/PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, only
PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE is implemented because RISCV allows each mode to
write to their own shadow stack using `sspush` or `ssamoswap`.
PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS locks current configuration of shadow stack
enabling.
Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 18 ++++++-
arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 8 +++
arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
index 4da9cbc8f9b5..0b3aff008c85 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/prctl.h>
struct task_struct;
struct kernel_clone_args;
@@ -14,7 +15,8 @@ struct kernel_clone_args;
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
struct cfi_status {
unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */
- unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 1);
+ unsigned long ubcfi_locked : 1;
+ unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 2);
unsigned long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */
unsigned long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */
unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */
@@ -27,6 +29,12 @@ void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned
unsigned long get_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *size);
void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr);
bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task);
+bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task);
+bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task);
+void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task);
+void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable);
+
+#define PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK (PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE)
#else
@@ -42,6 +50,14 @@ bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task);
#define is_shstk_enabled(task) false
+#define is_shstk_locked(task) false
+
+#define is_shstk_allocated(task) false
+
+#define set_shstk_lock(task)
+
+#define set_shstk_status(task, enable)
+
#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
index 632c621682f6..850128427936 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
@@ -152,6 +152,14 @@ void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc,
regs->epc = pc;
regs->sp = sp;
+ /*
+ * clear shadow stack state on exec.
+ * libc will set it later via prctl.
+ */
+ set_shstk_status(current, false);
+ set_shstk_base(current, 0, 0);
+ set_active_shstk(current, 0);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
regs->status &= ~SR_UXL;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
index 6cd166b73316..141ef70b08a3 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
@@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task)
return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en ? true : false;
}
+bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base ? true : false;
+}
+
+bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked ? true : false;
+}
+
void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size)
{
task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base = shstk_addr;
@@ -42,6 +52,23 @@ void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr)
task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk = shstk_addr;
}
+void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable)
+{
+ task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en = enable ? 1 : 0;
+
+ if (enable)
+ task->thread.envcfg |= ENVCFG_SSE;
+ else
+ task->thread.envcfg &= ~ENVCFG_SSE;
+
+ csr_write(CSR_ENVCFG, task->thread.envcfg);
+}
+
+void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked = 1;
+}
+
/*
* If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be as big as
* regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back
@@ -264,3 +291,83 @@ void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk)
vm_munmap(base, size);
set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0);
}
+
+int arch_get_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *status)
+{
+ unsigned long bcfi_status = 0;
+
+ if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* this means shadow stack is enabled on the task */
+ bcfi_status |= (is_shstk_enabled(t) ? PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE : 0);
+
+ return copy_to_user(status, &bcfi_status, sizeof(bcfi_status)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
+}
+
+int arch_set_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status)
+{
+ unsigned long size = 0, addr = 0;
+ bool enable_shstk = false;
+
+ if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Reject unknown flags */
+ if (status & ~PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* bcfi status is locked and further can't be modified by user */
+ if (is_shstk_locked(t))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ enable_shstk = status & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE;
+ /* Request is to enable shadow stack and shadow stack is not enabled already */
+ if (enable_shstk && !is_shstk_enabled(t)) {
+ /* shadow stack was allocated and enable request again
+ * no need to support such usecase and return EINVAL.
+ */
+ if (is_shstk_allocated(t))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ size = calc_shstk_size(0);
+ addr = allocate_shadow_stack(0, size, 0, false);
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ set_shstk_base(t, addr, size);
+ set_active_shstk(t, addr + size);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If a request to disable shadow stack happens, let's go ahead and release it
+ * Although, if CLONE_VFORKed child did this, then in that case we will end up
+ * not releasing the shadow stack (because it might be needed in parent). Although
+ * we will disable it for VFORKed child. And if VFORKed child tries to enable again
+ * then in that case, it'll get entirely new shadow stack because following condition
+ * are true
+ * - shadow stack was not enabled for vforked child
+ * - shadow stack base was anyways pointing to 0
+ * This shouldn't be a big issue because we want parent to have availability of shadow
+ * stack whenever VFORKed child releases resources via exit or exec but at the same
+ * time we want VFORKed child to break away and establish new shadow stack if it desires
+ *
+ */
+ if (!enable_shstk)
+ shstk_release(t);
+
+ set_shstk_status(t, enable_shstk);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *task,
+ unsigned long arg)
+{
+ /* If shtstk not supported or not enabled on task, nothing to lock here */
+ if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack() ||
+ !is_shstk_enabled(task) || (arg != 0))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ set_shstk_lock(task);
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists