lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3218fbe-7bb1-4fd6-8b00-beee244ffeae@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:22:51 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: frederic@...nel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 rcu 3/3] rcu: Finer-grained grace-period-end checks in
 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks()

This commit pushes the grace-period-end checks further down into
rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(), and also uses lockless checks coupled with
finer-grained locking.

The result is that the current leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock is
acquired only if a stack backtrace might be needed from the current CPU,
and is held across only that CPU's backtrace.  As a result, if there are
no stalled CPUs associated with a given rcu_node structure, then its
->lock will not be acquired at all.  On large systems, it is usually
(though not always) the case that a small number of CPUs are stalling
the current grace period, which means that the ->lock need be acquired
only for a small fraction of the rcu_node structures.

[ paulmck: Apply Dan Carpenter feedback. ]

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
index b530844becf85..925fcdad5dea2 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
@@ -342,20 +342,24 @@ static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(unsigned long gp_seq)
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 
 	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
-		if (gp_seq != data_race(rcu_state.gp_seq)) {
-			pr_err("INFO: Stall ended during stack backtracing.\n");
-			return;
-		}
 		printk_deferred_enter();
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
-		for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
+		for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
+			if (gp_seq != data_race(rcu_state.gp_seq)) {
+				printk_deferred_exit();
+				pr_err("INFO: Stall ended during stack backtracing.\n");
+				return;
+			}
+			if (!(data_race(rnp->qsmask) & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)))
+				continue;
+			raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 			if (rnp->qsmask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)) {
 				if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
 					pr_err("Offline CPU %d blocking current GP.\n", cpu);
 				else
 					dump_cpu_task(cpu);
 			}
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+		}
 		printk_deferred_exit();
 	}
 }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ