linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add GPU clocks for QCS8300

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fff416f9-4ea7-4117-87b0-986087f8e142@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:53:51 +0530
From: Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette
	<mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
        Taniya Das
	<quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
        "Satya
 Priya Kakitapalli" <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add GPU clocks for
 QCS8300



On 10/28/2024 12:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/10/2024 06:15, Imran Shaik wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/26/2024 5:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 07:01:14PM +0530, Imran Shaik wrote:
>>>> The QCS8300 GPU clock controller is mostly identical to SA8775P, but
>>>> QCS8300 has few additional clocks and minor differences. Hence, reuse
>>>> SA8775P gpucc bindings and add additional clocks required for QCS8300.
>>>
>>> IIUC, these clocks are not valid for SA8775p. How do we deal with such
>>> cases for other Qualcomm SoCs?
>>>
>>
>> These newly added clocks are not applicable to SA8755P. In the
>> gpucc-sa8775p driver, these clocks are marked to NULL for the SA8755P,
>> ensuring they are not registered to the CCF.
> 
> I meant bindings. And existing practice.
> 

In the bindings, the same approach is followed in other Qualcomm SoCs as 
well, where additional clocks are added to the existing identical SoC’s 
bindings.

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240818204348.197788-2-danila@jiaxyga.com

Thanks,
Imran

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>