lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89abba10-6924-47c2-ba53-93e2c44e2196@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:02:56 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: syzbot <syzbot+7988d9999219aea9f2db@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
 jaegeuk@...nel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_evict_inode

#syz test: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git dev-test

On 2024/10/8 14:51, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> syzbot found the following issue on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    3840cbe24cf0 sched: psi: fix bogus pressure spikes from ag..
> git tree:       upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10bbab9f980000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f95955e3f7b5790c
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7988d9999219aea9f2db
> compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=17a4b3d0580000
> 
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-3840cbe2.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/55888d19e055/vmlinux-3840cbe2.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f6b8ca10a019/bzImage-3840cbe2.xz
> mounted in repro #1: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1ebfe9150f9d/mount_0.gz
> mounted in repro #2: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/91e39079514c/mount_7.gz
> 
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+7988d9999219aea9f2db@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> 
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.12.0-rc1-syzkaller-00114-g3840cbe24cf0 #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> kswapd0/79 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff888057a62610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6844 [inline]
> ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
> 
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 
> 
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> 
> -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>         __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3834 [inline]
>         fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x140 mm/page_alloc.c:3848
>         might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:327 [inline]
>         prepare_alloc_pages+0x147/0x5d0 mm/page_alloc.c:4493
>         __alloc_pages_noprof+0x166/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4722
>         alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e8/0x680 mm/mempolicy.c:2265
>         alloc_pages_noprof mm/mempolicy.c:2345 [inline]
>         folio_alloc_noprof+0x128/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2352
>         filemap_alloc_folio_noprof+0xdf/0x500 mm/filemap.c:1010
>         do_read_cache_folio+0x2eb/0x850 mm/filemap.c:3787
>         read_mapping_folio include/linux/pagemap.h:1011 [inline]
>         f2fs_commit_super+0x52b/0x7d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4044
>         f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x13b/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4079
>         f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
>         f2fs_write_inode+0x35f/0x4d0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:785
>         f2fs_do_sync_file+0x1395/0x19f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:356
>         f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write fs/f2fs/file.c:2259 [inline]
>         __f2fs_ioctl+0x49db/0xb8f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:4417
>         vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
>         __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
>         __se_sys_ioctl+0xf9/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
>         do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
>         do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> 
> -> #1 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>         down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
>         f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
>         f2fs_record_errors fs/f2fs/super.c:4121 [inline]
>         f2fs_handle_error+0xf6/0x250 fs/f2fs/super.c:4138
>         __get_node_page+0x8d0/0xfc0 fs/f2fs/node.c:1489
>         f2fs_update_inode_page+0x87/0x170 fs/f2fs/inode.c:746
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
>         do_unlinkat+0x512/0x830 fs/namei.c:4540
>         __do_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4581 [inline]
>         __se_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4579 [inline]
>         __x64_sys_unlink+0x47/0x50 fs/namei.c:4579
>         do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
>         do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> 
> -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
>         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
>         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
>         validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
>         __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>         percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
>         __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline]
>         sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
>         dispose_list fs/inode.c:772 [inline]
>         prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:961
>         super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>         do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>         shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
>         shrink_slab+0x878/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:626
>         shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>         lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>         shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>         balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>         kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>         kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>         ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 
> Chain exists of:
>    sb_internal#2 --> &sbi->sb_lock --> fs_reclaim
> 
>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>         CPU0                    CPU1
>         ----                    ----
>    lock(fs_reclaim);
>                                 lock(&sbi->sb_lock);
>                                 lock(fs_reclaim);
>    rlock(sb_internal#2);
> 
>   *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
> 2 locks held by kswapd0/79:
>   #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6844 [inline]
>   #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>   #1: ffff888057a620e0 (&type->s_umount_key#54){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
>   #1: ffff888057a620e0 (&type->s_umount_key#54){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x94/0x4b0 fs/super.c:196
> 
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 79 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1-syzkaller-00114-g3840cbe24cf0 #0
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
>   dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>   print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
>   check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
>   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
>   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
>   validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
>   __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
>   lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>   percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
>   __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline]
>   sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899
>   f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
>   evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
>   f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>   evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
>   dispose_list fs/inode.c:772 [inline]
>   prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:961
>   super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>   do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>   shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
>   shrink_slab+0x878/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:626
>   shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>   shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>   lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>   shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>   kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>   balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>   kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>   kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>   ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
>   </TASK>
> 
> 
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
> 
> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
> 
> If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
> 
> If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
> #syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
> If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
> 
> If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
> #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
> (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
> 
> If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
> #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
> 
> If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
> #syz undup


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ