[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241029120755.GK20281@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:07:55 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Restore iommu_flush_iotlb_all()
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 01:03:42PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 08:42:01AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Strange that 0-day didn't flag this in my trees. We really need to get
> > 0-day running on the iommu list too :\
>
> In general I agree, but these issues where found with
> allnoconfig/allmodconfig builds. Or in other words, compile tests I
> expect patch submitters to do before sending changes my way.
I don't necessarily expect that. We have 0-day robots to do this, and
they are more effective..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists