lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241029133141.45335-1-pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:31:40 +0300
From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Cc: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>,
	Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
	Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
	Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@....com>,
	Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@....com>,
	amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lvc-project@...uxtesting.org,
	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
	Jonathan Gray <jsg@....id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process

Hi all,

I'm writing as a bystander working with 6.1.y stable branch and possibly
lacking some context with the established DRM -> stable patch flow, Cc'ing
a large number of people.

The commit being reverted from 6.1.y is the one that duplicates the
changes already backported to that branch with another commit. It is
essentially a "similar" commit but cherry-picked at some point during the
DRM development process.

The duplicate has no runtime effect but should not actually remain in the
stable trees. It was already reverted [1] from 6.6/6.10/6.11 but still made
its way later to 6.1.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20241007035711.46624-1-jsg@jsg.id.au/T/#u

At [1] Greg KH also stated that the observed problems are quite common
while backporting DRM patches to stable trees. The current duplicate patch
has in every sense a cosmetic impact but in other circumstances and for
other patches this may have gone wrong.

So, is there any way to adjust this process?

BTW, a question to the stable-team: what Git magic (3-way-merge?) let the
duplicate patch be applied successfully? The patch context in stable trees
was different to that moment so should the duplicate have been expected to
fail to be applied?

--
Fedor

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ