[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <208bef7b-1097-4c81-80ae-fc50d71cb7e5@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:49:44 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Mirela Rabulea <mirela.rabulea@....com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com, laurentiu.palcu@....com,
robert.chiras@....com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
LnxRevLi@....com, kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com, hdegoede@...hat.com,
dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com, mike.rudenko@...il.com,
alain.volmat@...s.st.com, julien.vuillaumier@....com, alice.yuan@....com
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: media: i2c: Add bindings for
OX05B1S sensor driver
On 29/10/2024 14:36, Mirela Rabulea wrote:
>>
>> Binding also looks very different than all other devices, so re-write it
>> starting from EXISTING GOOD bindings. Not some downstream stuff.
> Would this be a good example?
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx283.yaml
Yes, looks good.
>>
>> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
>> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
>> See also:
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
>>
>> A nit, subject: drop second/last "driver". Bindings are for hardware,
>> not drivers.
>
Please correct the example so it matches coding style. Just compare how
your DTS and imx DTS look like.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists