[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241030154551.GN14555@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:45:51 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...nel.org
Cc: juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org,
void@...ifault.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] sched: Cleanup sched_delayed handling for class
switches
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:13:01PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -5202,7 +5200,7 @@ static int scx_ops_enable(struct sched_e
> percpu_down_write(&scx_fork_rwsem);
> scx_task_iter_start(&sti);
> while ((p = scx_task_iter_next_locked(&sti))) {
> - unsigned int queue_flags = DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE;
> + unsigned int queue_flags = DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE | DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK;
> const struct sched_class *old_class = p->sched_class;
> const struct sched_class *new_class =
> __setscheduler_class(p->policy, p->prio);
> @@ -5210,9 +5208,7 @@ static int scx_ops_enable(struct sched_e
> if (old_class != new_class)
> queue_flags |= DEQUEUE_CLASS;
>
> - if (old_class != new_class && p->se.sched_delayed)
> - dequeue_task(task_rq(p), p, DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEUE_DELAYED);
> -
> + update_rq_clock(task_rq(p));
> scoped_guard (sched_change, p, DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE) {
> p->scx.slice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;
> p->sched_class = new_class;
TJ, strictly speaking you should probably do a __balance_callbacks() in
__scx_task_irq_rq_unlock(). The various switched_from() methods like to
queue_balance_callback().
I think you're currently good by the fact that only RT/DL do this, and
you're not touching those in these loops.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists