linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V1 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e001de-devkit: Enable SD card support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86zfml1tbv.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:52:36 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
Cc: <andersson@...nel.org>,
	<konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	<abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
	<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	<quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
	<jens.glathe@...schoolsolutions.biz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e001de-devkit: Enable SD card support

On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:35:50 +0100,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com> wrote:
> 
> The SD card slot found on the X1E001DE Snapdragon Devkit for windows
> board is controlled by SDC2 instance, so enable it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e001de-devkit.dts | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e001de-devkit.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e001de-devkit.dts
> index 432ffefc525a..f169714abcd3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e001de-devkit.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e001de-devkit.dts
> @@ -672,6 +672,19 @@ &remoteproc_cdsp {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> +&sdhc_2 {

It doesn't look like this path exists in the upstream dtsi. I guess
this applies on top of another series that isn't exclusively
targeting the devkit?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.