linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 11/14] cxl/pci: Rename RAS handler interfaces to also indicate CXL PCIe port support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241030155900.00000867@Huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:59:00 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
CC: <ming4.li@...el.com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	<dave@...olabs.net>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>, <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
	<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
	<oohall@...il.com>, <Benjamin.Cheatham@....com>, <rrichter@....com>,
	<nathan.fontenot@....com>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/14] cxl/pci: Rename RAS handler interfaces to also
 indicate CXL PCIe port support

On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:03:02 -0500
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com> wrote:

Patch title looks unconnected to the patch. Cut and paste issue?


> CXL PCIe port protocol error handling support will be added to the
> CXL drivers in the future. In preparation, rename the existing
> interfaces to support handling all CXL PCIe port protocol errors.
> 
> The driver's RAS support functions currently rely on a 'struct
> cxl_dev_state' type parameter, which is not available for CXL port
> devices. However, since the same CXL RAS capability structure is
> needed across most CXL components and devices, a common handling
> approach should be adopted.
> 
> To accommodate this, update the __cxl_handle_cor_ras() and
> __cxl_handle_ras() functions to use a `struct device` instead of
> `struct cxl_dev_state`.
> 
> No functional changes are introduced.
> 
> [1] CXL 3.1 Spec, 8.2.4 CXL.cache and CXL.mem Registers
> 
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
Otherwise looks fine