[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6796952b-22cf-4477-a4da-70ce9c3962eb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:19:43 +0100
From: Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Rome <jordalgo@...a.com>,
Sam James <sam@...too.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kerne.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] x86/asm: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-VDSO
On 28.10.2024 22:47, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> VDSO is the only part of the "kernel" using DWARF CFI directives. For
> the kernel proper, ensure the CFI_* macros don't do anything.
>
> These macros aren't yet being used outside of VDSO, so there's no
> functional change.
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
> index 430fca13bb56..b1aa3fcd5bca 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
...
> @@ -29,13 +39,24 @@
> * useful to anyone. Note we should not use this directive if we
> * ever decide to enable DWARF unwinding at runtime.
> */
> +
> .cfi_sections .debug_frame
> -#else
> - /*
> - * For the vDSO, emit both runtime unwind information and debug
> - * symbols for the .dbg file.
> - */
> - .cfi_sections .eh_frame, .debug_frame
> -#endif
> +
> +#define CFI_STARTPROC
> +#define CFI_ENDPROC
> +#define CFI_DEF_CFA
> +#define CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER
> +#define CFI_DEF_CFA_OFFSET
> +#define CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET
> +#define CFI_OFFSET
> +#define CFI_REL_OFFSET
> +#define CFI_REGISTER
> +#define CFI_RESTORE
> +#define CFI_REMEMBER_STATE
> +#define CFI_RESTORE_STATE
> +#define CFI_UNDEFINED
> +#define CFI_ESCAPE
Don't all of the above need to be defined to "#", so that they change
any parameters into an assembler comment? For example:
#define CFI_STARTPROC #
> +
> +#endif /* !BUILD_VDSO */
>
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_DWARF2_H */
Thanks and regards,
Jens
--
Jens Remus
Linux on Z Development (D3303) and z/VSE Support
+49-7031-16-1128 Office
jremus@...ibm.com
IBM
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH; Vorsitzender des
Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt; Geschäftsführung: David Faller; Sitz der
Gesellschaft: Böblingen; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
IBM Data Privacy Statement: https://www.ibm.com/privacy/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists