linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] sched: Cleanup sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZyKk0c99KRGQineg@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 11:27:45 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
	mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, void@...ifault.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] sched: Cleanup sched_delayed handling for class
 switches

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:45:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> TJ, strictly speaking you should probably do a __balance_callbacks() in
> __scx_task_irq_rq_unlock(). The various switched_from() methods like to
> queue_balance_callback().
> 
> I think you're currently good by the fact that only RT/DL do this, and
> you're not touching those in these loops.

Ah, will send a patch soon.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun