linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 03/13] iommufd: Add iommufd_verify_unfinalized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZyGwemWwixBA+VIh@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:05:14 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: <kevin.tian@...el.com>, <will@...nel.org>, <joro@...tes.org>,
	<suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>, <robin.murphy@....com>,
	<dwmw2@...radead.org>, <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
	<eric.auger@...hat.com>, <jean-philippe@...aro.org>, <mdf@...nel.org>,
	<mshavit@...gle.com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
	<smostafa@...gle.com>, <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, <aik@....com>,
	<zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/13] iommufd: Add iommufd_verify_unfinalized_object

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 03:55:58PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 09:18:05AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > I think we'd need the same change in iommufd_object_abort() too.
> 
> Makes sense

I found xa_cmpxchg() does xas_result to its returning value, which
turns XA_ZERO_ENTRY into NULL failing our intended verifications.

So, I replaced that further with xas_store:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -41,20 +41,26 @@ static struct miscdevice vfio_misc_dev;
 void iommufd_object_finalize(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
                             struct iommufd_object *obj)
 {
+       XA_STATE(xas, &ictx->objects, obj->id);
        void *old;

-       old = xa_store(&ictx->objects, obj->id, obj, GFP_KERNEL);
-       /* obj->id was returned from xa_alloc() so the xa_store() cannot fail */
-       WARN_ON(old);
+       xa_lock(&ictx->objects);
+       old = xas_store(&xas, obj);
+       xa_unlock(&ictx->objects);
+       /* obj->id was returned from xa_alloc() so the xas_store() cannot fail */
+       WARN_ON(old != XA_ZERO_ENTRY);
 }

 /* Undo _iommufd_object_alloc() if iommufd_object_finalize() was not called */
 void iommufd_object_abort(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, struct iommufd_object *obj)
 {
+       XA_STATE(xas, &ictx->objects, obj->id);
        void *old;

-       old = xa_erase(&ictx->objects, obj->id);
-       WARN_ON(old);
+       xa_lock(&ictx->objects);
+       old = xas_store(&xas, NULL);
+       xa_unlock(&ictx->objects);
+       WARN_ON(old != XA_ZERO_ENTRY);
        kfree(obj);
 }
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks
Nicolin