[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241029172920.21cee16a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:29:20 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx5: simplify EQ interrupt polling logic
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:51:12 -0600 Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> Use a while loop in mlx5_eq_comp_int() and mlx5_eq_async_int() to
> clarify the EQE polling logic. This consolidates the next_eqe_sw() calls
> for the first and subequent iterations. It also avoids a goto. Turn the
> num_eqes < MLX5_EQ_POLLING_BUDGET check into a break condition.
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists