lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZyGDlYsg6YWNXSVo@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:53:41 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, thomas.lendacky@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dyoung@...hat.com,
	daniel.kiper@...cle.com, noodles@...com, lijiang@...hat.com,
	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: rename the confusing local variable in
 early_memremap_is_setup_data()

On 10/29/24 at 07:11pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 04:16:14PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > In function early_memremap_is_setup_data(), parameter 'size' passed has
> > the same name as the local variable inside the while loop. That
> > confuses people who sometime mix up them when reading code.
> > 
> > Here rename the local variable 'size' inside while loop to 'sd_size'.
> > 
> > And also add one local variable 'sd_size' likewise in function
> > memremap_is_setup_data() to simplify code. In later patch, this can also
> > be used.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> > Acked-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> > index aa7d279321ea..f1ee8822ddf1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> > @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static bool memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr,
> 
> Huh?

Thanks for looking into this.

I ever doubted this, guess it could use the unused 'size' to avoid
warning? Noticed Tom introduced it at the beginning. It's better idea to
remove it if it's useless.

commit 8f716c9b5febf6ed0f5fedb7c9407cd0c25b2796
Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Date:   Mon Jul 17 16:10:16 2017 -0500

    x86/mm: Add support to access boot related data in the clear

Hi Tom,

Can you help check and tell your intention why the argument 'size' is
added into early_memremap_is_setup_data() and memremap_is_setup_data().

Thanks
Baoquan

> 
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> index 70b02fc61d93..e461d8e26871 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -632,8 +632,7 @@ static bool memremap_is_efi_data(resource_size_t phys_addr,
>   * Examine the physical address to determine if it is boot data by checking
>   * it against the boot params setup_data chain.
>   */
> -static bool memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr,
> -				   unsigned long size)
> +static bool memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr)
>  {
>  	struct setup_indirect *indirect;
>  	struct setup_data *data;
> @@ -769,7 +768,7 @@ bool arch_memremap_can_ram_remap(resource_size_t phys_addr, unsigned long size,
>  		return false;
>  
>  	if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
> -		if (memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, size) ||
> +		if (memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr) ||
>  		    memremap_is_efi_data(phys_addr, size))
>  			return false;
>  	}
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ