[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bda38b6e-73df-4ca5-8606-b4701a4db482@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:19:58 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/9] ice: use <linux/packing.h> for Tx and Rx
queue context data
Always just ignore the tool when it if it's not useful.
CHECK_PACKED_FIELDS_ macros are just build time asserts, right? I can easily
just hard code Smatch to ignore CHECK_PACKED_FIELDS_* macros. I'm just going to
go ahead an do that in the ugliest way possible. If we have a lot of these then
I'll do it properly.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists