[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b796ef4-735a-44df-a9b1-671df49fd44e@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:38:26 +0100
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com, will@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr, akiyks@...il.com,
dlustig@...dia.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, urezki@...il.com,
quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, frederic@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lkmm@...ts.linux.dev, hernan.poncedeleon@...weicloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic
and semantic tags
Am 10/30/2024 um 12:41 AM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:15:46PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
>>> Not all tags that are always there syntactically also provide semantic
>>> membership in the corresponding set. For example, an 'acquire tag on a
>>
>> Maybe:
>>
>> Not all annotated accesses provide the same semantic as their syntactic
>> tags...
>>
>> ?
>
> Jonas, are you OK with this change? If so, I can apply it on my next
> rebase.
>
I'm ok with an extra s after semantics and a minor rephrase:
Not all annotated accesses provide the semantics their syntactic
tags would imply
What do you think @Boqun ?
jonas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists