[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j4D2E+qWrhT7bn1PznW8vvjXDRPqpR+qjr2xDHvpHwbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:41:49 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] PM: EM: Add min/max available performance state limits
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:33 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/30/24 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:00 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/30/24 08:48, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> >>> Hi Rafael,
> >>>
> >>> On 10/29/24 18:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:43 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_update_performance_limits);
> >>>>
> >>>> It would be good to have at least one caller of this function in the
> >>>> tree.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I know, but we had delays with the SCMI cpufreq to get the
> >>> notifications support, which are sent from FW...
> >>>
> >>> The patch using this API was part of v1 but with assumption that
> >>> those SCMI notifications are merged.
> >>>
> >>> The patch v1 for the SCMI cpufreq driver [1].
> >>>
> >>> In that v1 cover letter I mentioned that the 2nd patch depends
> >>> on notifications [2].
> >>>
> >>> I will have to work with Cristian on that notification in SCMI
> >>> then this API will be used. I can see that it stuck for a while
> >>> in v5. Let me sort that out (probably not in this merge window
> >>> though).
> >>
> >> Just to link the effort which has been started into that direction:
> >>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ab36709d-a181-4621-a8e5-0ef38b80186b@arm.com/
> >
> > OK, then this can be queued up as a prerequisite for the upcoming changes.
> >
> > I would, however, mention that in the patch changelog and add a Link:
> > tag pointing to the above.
> >
>
> Thank you Rafael!
Well, there are a few comments to address first.
Please see the reply to the patch I've just sent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists