lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZyIfzELjiqrDMhk_@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:00:12 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH hotfix 6.12 v4 4/5] mm: refactor arch_calc_vm_flag_bits()
 and arm64 MTE handling

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 06:11:47PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> Currently MTE is permitted in two circumstances (desiring to use MTE having
> been specified by the VM_MTE flag) - where MAP_ANONYMOUS is specified, as
> checked by arch_calc_vm_flag_bits() and actualised by setting the
> VM_MTE_ALLOWED flag, or if the file backing the mapping is shmem, in which
> case we set VM_MTE_ALLOWED in shmem_mmap() when the mmap hook is activated
> in mmap_region().
> 
> The function that checks that, if VM_MTE is set, VM_MTE_ALLOWED is also set
> is the arm64 implementation of arch_validate_flags().
> 
> Unfortunately, we intend to refactor mmap_region() to perform this check
> earlier, meaning that in the case of a shmem backing we will not have
> invoked shmem_mmap() yet, causing the mapping to fail spuriously.
> 
> It is inappropriate to set this architecture-specific flag in general mm
> code anyway, so a sensible resolution of this issue is to instead move the
> check somewhere else.
> 
> We resolve this by setting VM_MTE_ALLOWED much earlier in do_mmap(), via
> the arch_calc_vm_flag_bits() call.
> 
> This is an appropriate place to do this as we already check for the
> MAP_ANONYMOUS case here, and the shmem file case is simply a variant of the
> same idea - we permit RAM-backed memory.
> 
> This requires a modification to the arch_calc_vm_flag_bits() signature to
> pass in a pointer to the struct file associated with the mapping, however
> this is not too egregious as this is only used by two architectures anyway
> - arm64 and parisc.
> 
> So this patch performs this adjustment and removes the unnecessary
> assignment of VM_MTE_ALLOWED in shmem_mmap().
> 
> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> Fixes: deb0f6562884 ("mm/mmap: undo ->mmap() when arch_validate_flags() fails")
> Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>

Thanks for respinning this. FTR,

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>

> @@ -151,13 +152,13 @@ calc_vm_prot_bits(unsigned long prot, unsigned long pkey)
>   * Combine the mmap "flags" argument into "vm_flags" used internally.
>   */
>  static inline unsigned long
> -calc_vm_flag_bits(unsigned long flags)
> +calc_vm_flag_bits(struct file *file, unsigned long flags)
>  {
>  	return _calc_vm_trans(flags, MAP_GROWSDOWN,  VM_GROWSDOWN ) |
>  	       _calc_vm_trans(flags, MAP_LOCKED,     VM_LOCKED    ) |
>  	       _calc_vm_trans(flags, MAP_SYNC,	     VM_SYNC      ) |
>  	       _calc_vm_trans(flags, MAP_STACK,	     VM_NOHUGEPAGE) |
> -	       arch_calc_vm_flag_bits(flags);
> +		arch_calc_vm_flag_bits(file, flags);

Nitpick (but please ignore, Andrew picked them up already): one space
alignment off.

-- 
Catalin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ