[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <43b6bbd9-ef5e-4031-9322-fecfa2a5c5cd@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:40:18 +0000
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@...e.com>, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] acpi: make EC support compile-time conditional
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024, at 15:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 1:39 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:19 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > All the direct callers of ec_read/ec_write already had an x86
>> > dependency and now also need to depend on APCI_EC.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>
>> I think I can pick up this one as the other two patches in the series
>> don't depend on it.
>>
>> Any concerns about doing that?
>
> No concerns, so applied (as 6.13 material, with minor edits in the subject).
>
> The other two patches in the series need to be updated AFAICS.
Thanks for picking up the first patch, I sent the other
updated patches as well now.
ARnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists