[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZyIxRExcJvKKv4JW@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:14:44 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: gutierrez.asier@...wei-partners.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, ryan.roberts@....com,
baohua@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
hocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stepanov.anatoly@...wei.com,
alexander.kozhevnikov@...wei-partners.com, guohanjun@...wei.com,
weiyongjun1@...wei.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
judy.chenhui@...wei.com, yusongping@...wei.com,
artem.kuzin@...wei.com, kang.sun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Cgroup-based THP control
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:33:08PM +0800, gutierrez.asier@...wei-partners.com wrote:
> From: Asier Gutierrez <gutierrez.asier@...wei-partners.com>
>
> Currently THP modes are set globally. It can be an overkill if only some
> specific app/set of apps need to get benefits from THP usage. Moreover, various
> apps might need different THP settings. Here we propose a cgroup-based THP
> control mechanism.
Or maybe we should stop making the sysadmin's life so damned hard and
figure out how to do without all of these settings?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists