[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9936883-d766-41f5-9a54-35702585ff6a@wdc.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:06:39 +0000
From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
CC: "oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev" <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>, "axboe@...nel.dk"
<axboe@...nel.dk>, "song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>, "yukuai3@...wei.com"
<yukuai3@...wei.com>, hch <hch@....de>, "martin.petersen@...cle.com"
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>, "hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: handle bio_split() error
On 30.10.24 15:01, kernel test robot wrote:
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>> fs/btrfs/bio.c:694:29: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected restricted blk_status_t [assigned] [usertype] ret @@ got long @@
Yep that definitively needs to be:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.c b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
index 96cacd5c03a5..847af28ecff9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/bio.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ static bool btrfs_submit_chunk(struct btrfs_bio
*bbio, int mirror_num)
if (map_length < length) {
bbio = btrfs_split_bio(fs_info, bbio, map_length);
if (IS_ERR(bbio)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(bbio);
+ ret = errno_to_blk_status(PTR_ERR(bbio));
goto fail;
}
bio = &bbio->bio;
Can you fold that in John or do you want me to send a new version?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists