lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <664a1251-203d-4d29-86c4-6edd36c23eb9@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 23:31:41 +0800
From: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
 Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
 Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
 Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: Fix assignment of the of_node of the
 parent to aux bridge

Hi,

On 2024/10/31 22:02, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:31:47PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On 30/10/2024 15:49, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>>> On 2024/10/21 21:08, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:49:34 +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>>>> The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
>>>>> of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
>>>>> report a gpio as already requested by a different device when both pinconf
>>>>> and gpios property are present.
>>>>> Fix that by using the device_set_of_node_from_dev() helper instead.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>> Thanks, Applied to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel.git (drm-misc-fixes)
>>>
>>> It's quite impolite to force push patches that still under reviewing,
>>> this prevent us to know what exactly its solves.
>> It's quite explicit.
> It's still disrespectful and prevents reviewers' work from being
> acknowledged as I told you off-list when you picked up the patch.
>
> You said it would not happen again, and I had better things to do so I
> let this one pass, but now it seems you insist that you did nothing
> wrong here.
>
> We do development in public and we should have had that discussion in
> public, if only so that no one thinks I'm ok with this.


Yeah, extremely correct, Johan!

While I am really don't know why a child device have to
share the referencing of the OF device node with its parent device?
Is possible to pass a child device node via the platform data to reference?

I means that, in DT systems, the child device can easily
have(find) its own device node to attached.
I'm imagining that it probably should be belong to the USB
connector device node or something like that.

Sorry, I'm confused. I understand that you also might be busy.
I think I probably should go back alone to think for a while.


> Johan

-- 
Best regards,
Sui


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ