linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/cpufeature: Document cpu_feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <74D1358D-952F-4D33-8A5A-1D6F87B49443@alien8.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:15:11 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
CC: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
 Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
 "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
 "avadhut.naik@....com" <avadhut.naik@....com>,
 "john.allen@....com" <john.allen@....com>,
 "mario.limonciello@....com" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
 "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 "Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
 "richard.gong@....com" <richard.gong@....com>,
 "jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
 "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
 "clemens@...isch.de" <clemens@...isch.de>,
 "hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
 "ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com" <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
 "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
 "naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com" <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com>,
 "carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com" <carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpufeature: Document cpu_feature_enabled() as the default to use

On October 31, 2024 7:26:27 PM GMT+01:00, Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com> wrote:
>Does "default CPU feature testing macro" roll better than "default CPU
>features testing macro"?

Waaay too finicky to me. No one cares, I'd say. 🤗😂

-- 
Sent from a small device: formatting sucks and brevity is inevitable.