[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <148489cc-50cd-42a5-b813-969c6c61ff1e@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 22:41:15 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio PĂ©rez
<eperezma@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Documentation: s390-diag.rst: make diag500 a
generic KVM hypercall
On 31.10.24 15:56, Eric Farman wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 16:14 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Let's make it a generic KVM hypercall, allowing other subfunctions to
>> be more independent of virtio.
>>
>> While at it, document that unsupported/unimplemented subfunctions result
>> in a SPECIFICATION exception.
>>
>> This is a preparation for documenting a new hypercall.
>
> s/hypercall/subfunction/ ?
Indeed, thanks! I assume this can be fixed up when applying, unless I
have to resend for other reasons.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/virt/kvm/s390/s390-diag.rst | 18 +++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>
>
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists