[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241031072136.JxDEfP5V@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:21:36 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] -next lockdep invalid wait context
On 2024-10-30 16:10:58 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> So I need to avoid calling kfree() within an smp_call_function() handler?
Yes. No kmalloc()/ kfree() in IRQ context.
> Thanx, Paul
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists