[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241031-romantic-active-spider-5bccd8@leitao>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 02:42:12 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/bugs: spectre user default must depend on
MITIGATION_SPECTRE_V2
Hello Pawan,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:40:53AM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 02:19:12AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > If this is the intention it should be
> > > clearly documented that enabling kernel mitigation does not enable user
> > > mitigation. And an explicit spectre_v2_user= is required to enable user
> > > mitigation.
> >
> > That is fair. I didn't find a place where to document about diferent
> > behavior when CONFIG_MITIGATION_X is disabled. What would you suggest?
>
> You could describe the behavior in the commit message and update kernel
> parameter documentation.
>
> With that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 1518343bbe22..f8bc02cd10ec 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -6241,6 +6241,8 @@
>
> Selecting 'on' will also enable the mitigation
> against user space to user space task attacks.
> + Selecting specific mitigation does not force enable
> + user mitigations.
>
> Selecting 'off' will disable both the kernel and
> the user space protections.
Sure, I will update it.
Thanks for the review!
--breno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists