Message-ID: <f11f1a3c-0626-4f6c-9bfd-1bf6fb37388e@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:59:12 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
 Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>, Jaroslav Kysela
 <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
 Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev>,
 Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com, kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: wcd937x-sdw: Add static channel
 mapping support

On 30/10/2024 06:07, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> On 10/23/2024 1:22 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:43:23AM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
>>> Add static channel mapping between master and slave rx/tx ports for
>>> Qualcomm wcd937x soundwire codec.
>>>
>>> Currently, the channel mask for each soundwire port is hardcoded in the
>>> wcd937x-sdw driver, and the same channel mask value is configured in the
>>> soundwire master.
>>>
>>> The Qualcomm boards like the QCM6490-IDP require different channel mask settings
>>> for the soundwire master and slave ports.
>>
>> Different than what? Other wcd937x? Which are these?
>>
> For Qualcomm QCM6490-IDP board soundwire master needs a different 
> channel mask setting.

I understand, but I asked different than which board? Maybe all boards
needs this different channel setting, so basically it is "not different".

> 
> The wcd937x channel mask values are hardcoded in wcd driver.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc5/source/sound/soc/codecs/wcd937x-sdw.c#L35
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc5/source/sound/soc/codecs/wcd938x-sdw.c#L37
> 
> In case of QCM6490-IDP the soundwire master and wcd937x require 
> different channel mask settings, not the same.
> For Example, wcd937x ADC2 connection
> 
>                            Master                 Slave (wcd937x)
>                       +--------------+           +--------------+
>                       |  +--------+  |           |  +--------+  |
>           ADC1  ----->|  | PORT1  |  |           |  |   TX1  | 
> |<-----------ADC1
>           ADC2  ----->|  |        |  |           |  |        |  |
>                       |  +--------+  |           |  +--------+  |
>                       |              |           |              |
>           ADC3  ----->|  +--------+  |           |  +--------+  |
>                       |  |  PORT2 |  |           |  |   TX2  | 
> |<-----------ADC2
>                       |  |        |  |           |  |        | 
> |<-----------ADC3
>                       |  +--------+  |           |  +--------+  |
>                       |              |           |              |
>                       |  +--------+  |           |  +--------+  |
>   DMIC0...DMIC3------>|  |  PORT3 |  |           |  |   TX3  | 
> |<-----------DMIC0...DMIC3
>                       |  |        |  |           |  |        | 
> |<-----------MBHC
>                       |  +--------+  |           |  +--------+  |
>                       |              |           |              |
>                       |  +--------+  |           |  +--------+  |
>   DMIC4...DMIC3 ----->|  |  PORT4 |  |           |  |   TX4  | 
> |<-----------DMIC4...DMIC7
>                       |  |        |  |           |  |        |  |
>                       |  +--------+  |           |  +--------+  |
>                       |              |           |              |
>                       +------------- +           +--------------+
> 
> 					
> For ADC2, The Slave needs to configure TX2 Port with channel mask value 
> 1 and
> For Master, it required PORT1 with channel mask  value 2.
> 
> 
> In existing design master and slave configured with same channel mask, 
> it will fail ADC2.
> The new design will help to configure channel mapping between master and 
> slave from DT.
> 
>>>
>>> With the introduction of the following channel mapping properties, it is now possible
>>> to configure the master channel mask directly from the device tree.
>>>
>>> The qcom,tx-channel-mapping property specifies the static channel mapping between the slave
>>> and master tx ports in the order of slave port channels which is adc1, adc2, adc3, adc4,
>>> dmic0, dmic1, mbhc, dmic2, dmic3, dmci4, dmic5, dmic6, dmic7.
>>
>> I still don't get what is the channel here.
>>
> Typo error,
> 
> The qcom,tx-channel-mapping property specifies the static channel 
> mapping between the slave
> 
> and master tx ports in the order of slave port channel index which are 
> adc1, adc2, adc3, adc4,
> 
> dmic0, dmic1, mbhc, dmic2, dmic3, dmci4, dmic5, dmic6, dmic7.
> 
> 
> 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc5/source/sound/soc/codecs/wcd937x.h#L599
> 
> 
> 
> Will be fixed in the next version
> 
>>>
>>> The qcom,rx-channel-mapping property specifies static channel mapping between the slave
>>> and master rx ports in the order of slave port channels which is hph_l, hph_r, clsh,
>>> comp_l, comp_r, lo, dsd_r, dsd_l.
>>
>> And this description copies binding :/.
>>
>> Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
>> process (neither too early nor over the limit):
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L597
>>
> 
> Ack
> 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/sound/qcom,wcd937x-sdw.yaml      | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,wcd937x-sdw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,wcd937x-sdw.yaml
>>> index d3cf8f59cb23..a6bc9b391db0 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,wcd937x-sdw.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,wcd937x-sdw.yaml
>>> @@ -58,6 +58,38 @@ properties:
>>>       items:
>>>         enum: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
>>>   
>>> +  qcom,tx-channel-mapping:
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      Specifies static channel mapping between slave and master tx port
>>> +      channels.
>>> +      In the order of slave port channels which is adc1, adc2, adc3, adc4,
>>> +      dmic0, dmic1, mbhc, dmic2, dmic3, dmci4, dmic5, dmic6, dmic7.
>>> +      ch_mask1 ==> bit mask value 1
>>> +      ch_mask2 ==> bit mask value 2
>>> +      ch_mask3 ==> bit mask value 4
>>> +      ch_mask4 ==> bit mask value 8
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint8-array
>>> +    minItems: 8
>>> +    maxItems: 13
>>
>> Why size is variable? This device has fixed amount of slave ports, I
>> think.
>>
> 
> yes will check modify
> 
>>> +    items:
>>> +      enum: [1, 2, 4, 8]
>>
>> What is the point of using bits if you cannot actually create a bit mask
>> out of it? Why this cannot be 7?
>>
> Actually, these values should be fixed: 1 (0001), 2 (0010), 4(0100), 
> 8(1000).

What is fixed here?

I asked why these look like bitmasks but they cannot be used as bitmask.
This is a mapping, so index is channel slave port channel number and the
value is master port channel number, no?

> 
> 
> If required to set 7, it is handled in wcd driver based on mixer commands.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc5/source/sound/soc/codecs/wcd937x.c#L1199

I talk about binding. Why you are not allowing value of 7 if this is a
mask? If this is not a mask - property says it is channel mapping - then
these should be [1-4].

> 
> 
> Example:
> WCD937X_HPH_L -> channel mask value is 1
> WCD937X_HPH_R -> channel mask value is 2



> 
> 
> The final channel mask for that specific port is 3
>>> +
>>> +  qcom,rx-channel-mapping:
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      Specifies static channels mapping between slave and master rx port
>>> +      channels.
>>> +      In the order of slave port channels, which is
>>> +      hph_l, hph_r, clsh, comp_l, comp_r, lo, dsd_r, dsd_l.
>>> +      ch_mask1 ==> bit mask value 1
>>> +      ch_mask2 ==> bit mask value 2
>>> +      ch_mask3 ==> bit mask value 4
>>> +      ch_mask4 ==> bit mask value 8
>>
>> and the value is what exactly? Index is channel, but what does "ch_mask4 ==> bit
>> mask value 8" mean? I don't understand this at all.
>>
> 
>                            Master
>                       +--------------+
>                       |  +--------+  |
>            ADC1 ----->|  | PORT1  |  |
>            ADC2 ----->|  |        |  |
>                       |  +--------+  |
>                       |              |
>            ADC3 ----->|  +--------+  |
>                       |  |  PORT2 |  |
>                       |  |        |  |
>                       |  +--------+  |
>                       |              |
>                       |  +--------+  |
>    DMIC0...DMIC3 ---->|  |  PORT3 |  |
>                       |  |        |  |
>                       |  +--------+  |
>                       |              |
>                       |  +--------+  |
>    DMIC4...DMIC7----->|  |  PORT4 |  |
>                       |  |        |  |
>                       |  +--------+  |
>                       |              |
>                       +------------- +
> 
> 
> The PORT1 has 2 ADC connections,
> 
> ADC1 -> PORT1 ch_mask index 1 -> channel mask value 1 (0001)
> ADC2 -> PORT1 ch_mask index 2 -> channel mask value 2 (0010)
> 
> 
> DMIC0 -> PORT3 ch_mask index 1 -> channel mask value 1 (0001)
> DMIC1 -> PORT3 ch_mask index 2 -> channel mask value 2 (0010)
> DMIC2 -> PORT3 ch_mask index 3 -> channel mask value 4 (0100)
> DMIC3 -> PORT3 ch_mask index 4 -> channel mask value 8 (1000)
> 
> 
> Will check and add a proper description.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists