lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <173036933725.3137.3413400151949944467.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:08:57 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Andrii Nakryiko" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
 "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: perf/core] uprobes: allow put_uprobe() from non-sleepable
 softirq context

The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     2bf8e5aceff899f5117f14c73e869a61c44d8a69
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/2bf8e5aceff899f5117f14c73e869a61c44d8a69
Author:        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
AuthorDate:    Wed, 23 Oct 2024 21:41:58 -07:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:42:19 +01:00

uprobes: allow put_uprobe() from non-sleepable softirq context

Currently put_uprobe() might trigger mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock(), which
makes it unsuitable to be called from more restricted context like softirq.

Let's make put_uprobe() agnostic to the context in which it is called,
and use work queue to defer the mutex-protected clean up steps.

RB tree removal step is also moved into work-deferred callback to avoid
potential deadlock between softirq-based timer callback, added in the
next patch, and the rest of uprobe code.

We can rework locking altogher as a follow up, but that's significantly
more tricky, so warrants its own patch set. For now, we need to make
sure that changes in the next patch that add timer thread work correctly
with existing approach, while concentrating on SRCU + timeout logic.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241024044159.3156646-2-andrii@kernel.org
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 4ef4b51..d7e4892 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
 #include <linux/khugepaged.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
 
 #include <linux/uprobes.h>
 
@@ -61,7 +62,10 @@ struct uprobe {
 	struct list_head	pending_list;
 	struct list_head	consumers;
 	struct inode		*inode;		/* Also hold a ref to inode */
-	struct rcu_head		rcu;
+	union {
+		struct rcu_head		rcu;
+		struct work_struct	work;
+	};
 	loff_t			offset;
 	loff_t			ref_ctr_offset;
 	unsigned long		flags;		/* "unsigned long" so bitops work */
@@ -625,10 +629,9 @@ static void uprobe_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 	kfree(uprobe);
 }
 
-static void put_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
+static void uprobe_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&uprobe->ref))
-		return;
+	struct uprobe *uprobe = container_of(work, struct uprobe, work);
 
 	write_lock(&uprobes_treelock);
 
@@ -652,6 +655,15 @@ static void put_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
 	call_rcu_tasks_trace(&uprobe->rcu, uprobe_free_rcu);
 }
 
+static void put_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
+{
+	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&uprobe->ref))
+		return;
+
+	INIT_WORK(&uprobe->work, uprobe_free_deferred);
+	schedule_work(&uprobe->work);
+}
+
 static __always_inline
 int uprobe_cmp(const struct inode *l_inode, const loff_t l_offset,
 	       const struct uprobe *r)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ