linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] pmdomain: ti_sci: collect and send low-power mode constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpdgg+kM_Ot5GPTpMUtjmBF-pUhCeRpVb=j852_7qm=3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:11:52 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@...com>, 
	Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, Akashdeep Kaur <a-kaur@...com>, Sebin Francis <sebin.francis@...com>, 
	Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] pmdomain: ti_sci: collect and send low-power mode constraints

On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 20:43, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 14:01, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Kevin Hilman,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 06 Sep 2024 09:14:48 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> > The latest (10.x) version of the firmware for the PM co-processor (aka
> >> > device manager, or DM) adds support for a "managed" mode, where the DM
> >> > firmware will select the specific low power state which is entered
> >> > when Linux requests a system-wide suspend.
> >> >
> >> > In this mode, the DM will always attempt the deepest low-power state
> >> > available for the SoC.
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >>
> >> I have applied the following to branch ti-drivers-soc-next on [1].
> >> Thank you!
> >>
> >> Ulf, based on your ack[2], I have assumed that you want me to pick
> >> this series up. Let me know if that is not the case and I can drop the
> >> series.
> >
> > Well, that was a while ago. The reason was because there was a
> > dependency to another series [2], when this was posted.
> >
> > If that's not the case anymore, I think it's better to funnel this via
> > my pmdomain tree. Please let me know how to proceed.
>
> The build-time dependency on [2] still exists, and since that was just
> queued up by Nishanth, I think this series should (still) go along with
> it to keep things simple.
>
> Kevin

Right, that makes perfect sense to me too. If we discover conflicts,
let's deal with them then.

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe