linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/16] x86/amd_nb: Simplify root device search

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241031112027.GIZyNn-2JkbpnNJhw1@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:20:27 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, avadhut.naik@....com,
	john.allen@....com, mario.limonciello@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com, richard.gong@....com, jdelvare@...e.com,
	linux@...ck-us.net, clemens@...isch.de, hdegoede@...hat.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com, carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/16] x86/amd_nb: Simplify root device search

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 05:21:40PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> The "root" device search was introduced to support SMN access for Zen
> systems. This device represents a PCIe root complex. It is not the
> same as the "CPU/node" devices found at slots 0x18-0x1F.
> 
> There may be multiple PCIe root complexes within an AMD node. Such is
> the case with server or HEDT systems, etc. Therefore it is not enough to

HEDT?

...

> +struct pci_dev *amd_node_get_root(u16 node)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *df_f0 __free(pci_dev_put) = NULL;
> +	struct pci_dev *root;
> +	u16 cntl_off;
> +	u8 bus;
> +
> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ZEN))

check_for_deprecated_apis: WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c:67: Do not use boot_cpu_has() - use cpu_feature_enabled() instead

> +		return NULL;

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette