[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202410311924.XtRR5d9M-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 19:47:05 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx@...elfx.name>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: Move arch_init_invariance_cppc() call
later
Hi Mario,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.12-rc5 next-20241031]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mario-Limonciello/ACPI-processor-Move-arch_init_invariance_cppc-call-later/20241030-015107
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241029174910.600482-1-superm1%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: Move arch_init_invariance_cppc() call later
config: i386-randconfig-141-20241031 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241031/202410311924.XtRR5d9M-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241031/202410311924.XtRR5d9M-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410311924.XtRR5d9M-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c:273:2: error: call to undeclared function 'arch_init_invariance_cppc'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
273 | arch_init_invariance_cppc();
| ^
1 error generated.
vim +/arch_init_invariance_cppc +273 drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
239
240 /*
241 * We keep the driver loaded even when ACPI is not running.
242 * This is needed for the powernow-k8 driver, that works even without
243 * ACPI, but needs symbols from this driver
244 */
245 static enum cpuhp_state hp_online;
246 static int __init acpi_processor_driver_init(void)
247 {
248 int result = 0;
249
250 if (acpi_disabled)
251 return 0;
252
253 if (!cpufreq_register_notifier(&acpi_processor_notifier_block,
254 CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER)) {
255 acpi_processor_cpufreq_init = true;
256 acpi_processor_ignore_ppc_init();
257 }
258
259 result = driver_register(&acpi_processor_driver);
260 if (result < 0)
261 return result;
262
263 result = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
264 "acpi/cpu-drv:online",
265 acpi_soft_cpu_online, NULL);
266 if (result < 0)
267 goto err;
268 hp_online = result;
269 cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_ACPI_CPUDRV_DEAD, "acpi/cpu-drv:dead",
270 NULL, acpi_soft_cpu_dead);
271
272 acpi_processor_throttling_init();
> 273 arch_init_invariance_cppc();
274 return 0;
275 err:
276 driver_unregister(&acpi_processor_driver);
277 return result;
278 }
279
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists