[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9mf2H8xZ+uZyeQqiGEDY35tyDBP-UpaqXhe_padv=Dqmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 09:30:16 -0400
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] rust: reorder `ForeignOwnable` items
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 8:40 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 1:23 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > This change was part of the original patch. Do you prefer the code
> > movement in the same commit?
>
> If we do it, please keep it separate, that is a good idea.
>
> However, I think Andreas means to avoid the movement at all,
> regardless of which commit is used to do it.
Understood. I'll update the commit message to explain that this also
avoids inconsistency with the implementation in kbox.rs, which is
already in this order.
Andreas, please let me know if this is acceptable.
Thanks.
Tamir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists