linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] pmdomain: ti_sci: collect and send low-power mode constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7hwmhnnf0f.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 08:35:28 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Vibhore
 Vardhan <vibhore@...com>, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, Akashdeep Kaur
 <a-kaur@...com>, Sebin Francis <sebin.francis@...com>, Markus
 Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] pmdomain: ti_sci: collect and send low-power
 mode constraints

Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> writes:

> On 11:11-20241031, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 20:43, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> writes:
>> >
>> > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 14:01, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi Kevin Hilman,
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, 06 Sep 2024 09:14:48 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> > >> > The latest (10.x) version of the firmware for the PM co-processor (aka
>> > >> > device manager, or DM) adds support for a "managed" mode, where the DM
>> > >> > firmware will select the specific low power state which is entered
>> > >> > when Linux requests a system-wide suspend.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > In this mode, the DM will always attempt the deepest low-power state
>> > >> > available for the SoC.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [...]
>> > >>
>> > >> I have applied the following to branch ti-drivers-soc-next on [1].
>> > >> Thank you!
>> > >>
>> > >> Ulf, based on your ack[2], I have assumed that you want me to pick
>> > >> this series up. Let me know if that is not the case and I can drop the
>> > >> series.
>> > >
>> > > Well, that was a while ago. The reason was because there was a
>> > > dependency to another series [2], when this was posted.
>> > >
>> > > If that's not the case anymore, I think it's better to funnel this via
>> > > my pmdomain tree. Please let me know how to proceed.
>> >
>> > The build-time dependency on [2] still exists, and since that was just
>> > queued up by Nishanth, I think this series should (still) go along with
>> > it to keep things simple.
>> >
>> > Kevin
>> 
>> Right, that makes perfect sense to me too. If we discover conflicts,
>> let's deal with them then.
>
>
> oops.. I missed this response. OK, I will let things be.
>

Oops, 0day bot found a build error in linux-next when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is
not defined[1].  Need to respin to fix this.

v5 coming right up....

Kevin

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYtioQ22nVr9m22+qyMqUNRsGdA=cFw_j1OUv=x8Pcs-bw@mail.gmail.com/