[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQL-YGPDcMdJEu7E7-OKpzUaE8Kax7zOW-JYi4aPNivN7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 09:26:55 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH trace/for-next 2/3] bpf: decouple BPF link/attach hook and
BPF program sleepable semantics
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 2:23 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> static inline void bpf_link_init(struct bpf_link *link, enum bpf_link_type type,
> const struct bpf_link_ops *ops,
> - struct bpf_prog *prog)
> + struct bpf_prog *prog, bool sleepable)
> +{
> +}
Obvious typo caught by build bot...
Other than that the set looks good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists