linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] spi: apple: Add driver for Apple SPI controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241101163942.GC194146@robin.jannau.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 17:39:42 +0100
From: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
	Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] spi: apple: Add driver for Apple SPI controller

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 04:27:32PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 05:19:05PM +0100, Janne Grunau wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 04:08:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 03:25:04PM +0100, Janne Grunau via B4 Relay wrote:
> 
> > > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-apple.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,531 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Apple SoC SPI device driver
> 
> > > Please make the entire comment block a C++ one so things look more
> > > intentional.
> 
> > I did after your the same comment in v1 but reverted that since
> > checkpatch.pl complained. See
> 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/checkpatch.pl?id=a674fefd1732#n3742
> 
> > The inconsistency between *.h and *.c is surprising. I'll change it and
> > ignore checkpatch.pl for v3. I'll address the other comemnts as well.
> 
> Did you make the comment block a C++ one or a C one?  The SPDX header
> does need to be a C++ comment (//) for the SPDX parsers so I'm saying
> make everything else also use //.  There's some constraints from tools
> that consume C headers but don't support the C++ syntax.

err, yes. parsing error on my part. Will change the whole comment to a
C++ style comment.

Janne