[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZyUr64wRvSbSB378@google.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 12:28:43 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, jpoimboe@...nel.org, kai.huang@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, sandipan.das@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Distinguish between variants of IBPB
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:51:33PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > [1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Clarify semantics of X86_FEATURE_IBPB
> > > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/43801a0dbb38
> > > [2/4] x86/cpufeatures: Define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB_RET
> > > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/99d252e3ae3e
> >
> > ff898623af2e ("x86/cpufeatures: Define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB_RET")
>
> Doh. I think I'll rebase the entire misc branch onto rc5, realistically the only
> downside is having to send updates for all of the hashes.
>
> Thanks for catching this!
New hashes after the rebase:
[3/4] KVM: x86: Advertise AMD_IBPB_RET to userspace
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/71dd5d5300d2
[4/4] KVM: x86: AMD's IBPB is not equivalent to Intel's IBPB
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/de572491a975
Powered by blists - more mailing lists